|
|
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Dabbling
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 214
Thanks: 7
Thanked 42 Times in 34 Posts
|
Samco resonator delete hose.
Guys, if anyone is interested in a group buy for the Samco resonator delete hose, (this is NOT for the 5 piece turbo hose kit which contains the mentioned) then let me know, it is available in Blue/Red/Black/Yellow/Orange/Purple/Green/BRG, other colours like White/Silver/Flame etc etc will be 15% more than a standard colour!
£66.50 inc VAT for 1 £60.00 inc VAT for 5 interested £55.00 inc VAT for 10 interested All the prices will be subject to P+P. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
__________________
Performance Powered By Thought. Engineered Horsepower. |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links |
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
Team MT
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Yah, im Litterly in ........
Posts: 10,569
Thanks: 209
Thanked 789 Times in 726 Posts
|
good prices imo
__________________
Posh Twit builds A Mini : Its A Project This week: I have been thinking i cant be arsed to change my Team Dynamics, ive become strangely attached to them.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) |
|
Dabbling
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 214
Thanks: 7
Thanked 42 Times in 34 Posts
|
Hello Jon,
In my opinion it is a modification that has a trade off on a stock R55/R56/R57 Equiped with a stock intercooler, the cooling efficency of the stock intercooler versus the removal of the stock resonator/restrictor and replace with the resonator/restrictor delete hose, if/when you remove the stock resonator/restrictor hose you loose cooling efficency of the intercooler but gain with an unrestricted air flow, which in turn is felt as a positive from having higher velocity air speed passing through the stock intercooler, (less cooling efficency due to high velocity air speed) and therfore retaing most of the initial positive boost all the way to the throttle butterfly, some people see this as a gain, when infact all that has happened is the stock intercooler has lost efficency, and could be replaced with a length of tube! However when a larger than stock intercooler is fitted, then we have achieved in slowing the air speed down as we have increased volume mass! Now the resonator delete hose will be of more benefit, in keeping up the positive air speed into the intercooler, and the larger volume mass will now do the same effect as the stock setup, slowing the air speed down! A good intercooler will have good cooling efficency, as well as a low positive pressure drop (restriction) hence you will gain from the fitment of a larger volume mass intercooler with a resonator delete hose. With that said it is now a personal choice!
__________________
Performance Powered By Thought. Engineered Horsepower. |
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to czar For This Useful Post: | jon (09-02-10) |
|
|
#8 (permalink) | |
|
Lupo GTI owner
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: North East
Posts: 2,578
Thanks: 105
Thanked 240 Times in 205 Posts
|
Quote:
![]()
__________________
::: Fun: Lupo GTI ::: Commuter: MINI ONE D ::: Previous: R56 JCW :::
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) |
|
Dabbling
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 214
Thanks: 7
Thanked 42 Times in 34 Posts
|
No not at all, it wont be that dramatic, I am just pointing out that the faster you push air through the intercooler, the less time the air spends in the intercooler being cooled.
__________________
Performance Powered By Thought. Engineered Horsepower. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Tags |
| delete, hose, resonator, samco |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|