Mini Torque
 
Go Back   Mini Torque > First Generation MINI - R50, R52 & R53 > Engine & Drivetrain

What are the differences between a 15, 16, 17 & 19% pulley..?


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 25-07-08, 17:32   #21 (permalink)
George
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally Posted by Reedy View Post
Right following on from Pulleys as i now have a better understanding
Thanks everyone

What does a upgraded crank pulley do..?
Same as a reduced sized s/c pulley, but by the opposite way in being larger

I have seen 2% crank pulleys is there any other types..??
3% iirc


If you have a 15% supercharger pulley and you add a 2% crank pulley does that mean you get the performance of a 17% supercharger pulley..??

yes



What BHP differences would you see on a 15% and 17% back to back?
  Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old 25-07-08, 17:46   #22 (permalink)
Becoming Addicted
 
Jaw_F430's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Merseyside
Posts: 2,919
Thanks: 186
Thanked 155 Times in 139 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by George View Post
What BHP differences would you see on a 15% and 17% back to back?
I don't think there would be a massive difference TBH. Maybe Paul could chime in with some figures
__________________
http://www.syntol-lubricants.com/srl_480_range.htm
13.7@103.9@2846lbs
USED to be Worlds Quickest & Fastest M45 Cooper S running stock clutch and not stripped out


M3 CSL 360bhp sold
Cooper S Was 270+bhp . . . .now ~200bhp
Jaw_F430 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25-07-08, 18:01   #23 (permalink)
Regular User
 
Reedy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Banbury
Posts: 450
Thanks: 39
Thanked 30 Times in 30 Posts
Garage
Ok so if a 15% supercharger pulley and 2% crank pulley give the performance of a 17% supercharger pulley....why bother with a crank pulley and not just go and fit a 17% pulley..?
Reedy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25-07-08, 18:04   #24 (permalink)
George
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Because some people fit a 15% first then want to increase, or do what alex did and add a 3% to his JCW pulley that the car came with to make 14%ish

Jaw, maybe theres no difference in total BHP figure, but I'm pretty sure there will be more low down hp/torque
  Reply With Quote
Old 25-07-08, 18:07   #25 (permalink)
Regular User
 
Reedy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Banbury
Posts: 450
Thanks: 39
Thanked 30 Times in 30 Posts
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by George View Post
Because some people fit a 15% first then want to increase, or do what alex did and add a 3% to his JCW pulley that the car came with to make 14%ish

Jaw, maybe theres no difference in total BHP figure, but I'm pretty sure there will be more low down hp/torque
ok but why not just change the pulley to a 17%..??
Reedy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25-07-08, 18:26   #26 (permalink)
Becoming Addicted
 
Jaw_F430's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Merseyside
Posts: 2,919
Thanks: 186
Thanked 155 Times in 139 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by George View Post
Because some people fit a 15% first then want to increase, or do what alex did and add a 3% to his JCW pulley that the car came with to make 14%ish

Jaw, maybe theres no difference in total BHP figure, but I'm pretty sure there will be more low down hp/torque
Yes it moves the power in the rev range
__________________
http://www.syntol-lubricants.com/srl_480_range.htm
13.7@103.9@2846lbs
USED to be Worlds Quickest & Fastest M45 Cooper S running stock clutch and not stripped out


M3 CSL 360bhp sold
Cooper S Was 270+bhp . . . .now ~200bhp
Jaw_F430 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25-07-08, 18:36   #27 (permalink)
Frequent User
 
citro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Portugal
Posts: 920
Thanks: 162
Thanked 115 Times in 95 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Reedy View Post
Ok so if a 15% supercharger pulley and 2% crank pulley give the performance of a 17% supercharger pulley....why bother with a crank pulley and not just go and fit a 17% pulley..?
I've got the 15% S/C pulley and the 2% Crank pulley combo, and from what I've read, it is quite identical to having a 17% S/C pulley, with the advantage of losing some weight on the crank which, theoretically speaking, makes the car "looser", revving faster.
citro is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to citro For This Useful Post:
Reedy (25-07-08)
Old 28-07-08, 08:07   #28 (permalink)
Becoming Addicted
 
R53mcs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,237
Thanks: 21
Thanked 60 Times in 58 Posts
15 +2 = 17 .... its not quite that simple!

Yes basically the theory is if you fit X supercharger pulley, and then add Y crank you get more boost though ... You can kind of expect a 15+2 to make around the same power as 17 ... not far off anyhow. There are concerns expressed on cranks, but in my eyes some of this is people who just dont know worrying unduly, some is scarmongering, and as yet knowone really knows. I have yet to have anyone actually show me a cranked car thats had a failure that can be tracked directly to the crank pulley, as the same fault has been seen on non cranked cars!
R53mcs is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to R53mcs For This Useful Post:
Reedy (28-07-08)
Old 28-07-08, 13:16   #29 (permalink)
MINI!
 
MINI-Morgan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Southampton
Posts: 2,702
Thanks: 74
Thanked 176 Times in 149 Posts
Garage
Send a message via MSN to MINI-Morgan Send a message via Yahoo to MINI-Morgan
A few questions you need to ask too:

1) is +2% the eqivalant of 2% on the SC or 2% increase in crank size. On the SC this will be much much more than 2%

2) Think of gear ratios..... now whats easier for the engine to turn. 15% SC and +2% Crank or 17% SC pulley. Anyone done the test?
MINI-Morgan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28-07-08, 13:28   #30 (permalink)
Becoming Addicted
 
R53mcs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,237
Thanks: 21
Thanked 60 Times in 58 Posts
The other bonus of oversized cranks, if there is any is that as its a 2% increase over stock this means the contact area is larger with the belt. A common issue with 17 and more reduced pulleys is tendency for belt stretch and slip, as the contact area for the belt is reduced. If you fit a 15-17 reduction scharge pulley and an oversize crank you gain some of this contact area back thus giving the added bonus of a slightly reduced risk of slip, and maybe a reduced risk of stretch but with increased boost?!
R53mcs is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
19%, differences, pulley


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 06:49.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0
Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.